Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (12) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r of assessment orders passed under s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The assessee has also field Cross Objection No.195/Ahd/2012 relevant to AY 2009-10 as captioned above. 2. Both the appeals and cross objection are disposed of by this common order. 3. In the Revenue's appeals, the common ground agitated by the Assessing Officer (AO) is towards deletion of addition in respect of under valuation of closing stock made by the AO. 4. The facts being common, we shall briefly narrate the facts concerning AY 2009-10. 5. Briefly stated, the AO in the course of scrutiny assessment observed that the assessee has not included the value of statutory duty/levy towards CENVAT component on raw-material lying .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1. Ground no. 4 relates to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 51,59,563/- made u/s. 145A of the Act on account of CENVAT paid on raw material. 1. On perusal of the trading and Profit and Loss account of the assessee, the A.O noticed that while valuing the closing stock as on 31.03.2008, the assessee has not included a sum of Rs. 51,59,563/- being the CENVAT paid on the raw material lying in the closing stock . The assessee was asked to explain why the same should not be added to the value of the closing stock in view of the provisions of Section 145A of the Act. Assessee filed a detailed reply explaining that it is maintaining exclusive system of accounting in so far as CENVAT is concerned. It was explained that the CENVAT paid on purch .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ase laws also support the case of the appellant. (2) The A.O. has not commented on the accounting policies followed by the appellant. The policy of valuation of closing stock consistently followed by the appellant in the previous years as well as in the succeeding years. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Voltamp Transformers Ltd. v/s. CIT (2008) reported on 217 CTR 254 has held that A.O. has got very limited powers to change valuation of closing stock. The A.O. cannot change method of accounting regularly followed by the assessee without valid reasons. (3) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chainrup Sampatram (1953) reported on 24 ITR 481 has clearly held that profits does not arise out of valuation of closing st .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... egard to the aforesaid view of the Coordinate Bench already taken in assessee's own case, we decline to interfere with the order of CIT(A). 11. In the result, Revenue's appeals in ITA No.1717/Ahd/2012 for AY 2009-10 & ITA No.3392/Ahd/2014 for Ay 2010-11 are dismissed. 12. Now we shall turn to Assessee's Cross Objection in CO No.195/Ahd/2012 (in Revenue's ITA No.1717/Ahd/2012) relevant to AY 2009-10. 13. The grounds of Cross Objection raised by the assessee read as under:- 1. The ld.CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 83,926/- made by the AO u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act without proper consideration and appreciation of the facts of the case. In view of facts and submissions filed, the impugned addition ought to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The Revenue is under duty and obligation to act in a fair and non-partisan manner. The power available to the AO cannot be exercised in the manner which is most beneficial to the Revenue and consequently most adverse to the assessee by taking advantage of the ignorance or mistake on the part of the assessee. The assessee having not claimed the depreciation eligible to it under law, will not operate as estoppel when relevant facts are available on record. In the circumstances, we do not subscribe to the dismissal of the claim of depreciation allowances stated to eligible to the assessee by the CIT(A). The aforesaid view finds support from plethora of decisions including judgement of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Pruthvi Br .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates