2017 (12) TMI 696

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate for the Appellant (s) Md. Altaf, Asstt. Commissioner (A.R.) for the Revenue ORDER Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhw After hearing both sides, I find that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of pipes, tubes of various sizes, grades and thickness out of H.R.Coils. Their factory was visited by the Central Excise Officers on 17.12.13, who conducted various checks and verifications. As a result .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o other evidence on record to show any clandestine removal. Even the statement of the Director has admitted only shortages, but no clandestine removal of the goods. 4. The original adjudicating authority did not find favour with the above pleas and confirmed the demand, as proposed in the inotice along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty. The said order of the original adjudic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s followed by the Tribunal in the cases of (i) Commr. of Central Excise, Meerut I Vs. Sarvottam Rolling Mills (P) Ltd. : 2013 (297) ELT 385 (Tri.-Del.) & (ii) Behariji Marketing : 2015 (317) ELT 298 (Tri.-Del.). At the stage, I may also take note of the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court's decision in the case of Commr. of Central Excise & Service Tax, Ludhiana Vs. Anand Founders .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X