2014 (7) TMI 1260

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, Advocates for therespondent ORDER 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 2. The revenue, by these appeals, has raised the following substantial questions of law : "(a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT Panaji is correct in holding that the assessee is engaged in manufacturing activities ? (b) The ITAT, Panaji has not appreciate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the earlier year by the revenue in assessee's case. The Tribunal also found that earlier the Assessing Officer had confirmed that the activity undertaken by the assessee qualifies to be a manufacturing activity. The Tribunal accordingly applied the principle of consistency and allowed the deduction under Section 80-IB of the Act. 5. The Division Bench of this Court in "CIT v. Arts & Crafts Ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X