2018 (2) TMI 553

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hudesai, Superintendent (AR) for the respondent Per: Justice Dr. Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against order-in-appeal No. JAK(235-236)113&114/08 dated 12/09/2008. 2.  The brief facts of the case are that the appellant, M/s FDC Ltd, is engaged in the manufacture of drugs and cosmetics items. The appellant M/s FDC Ltd has given the raw material to M/s Navketan Pharma Pvt. Ltd. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at - "17. In our opinion, the submissions made on behalf of the respondent are correct and the appeals deserve to be dismissed for the reason that the manufacturing activity was done only by the job workers in their premises and with the help of their labour force and machinery. Simply because the job workers had to adhere to the quality control or the specification with regard to the quality pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r liable under the said Act. There is also a provision in the said Act with regard to getting the drugs manufactured by someone else. So a manufacturer, who is having a license to manufacture, can get the drugs/ medicaments manufactured by another person under his supervision and he would be liable if the drugs manufactured by someone else are not as per the prescribed quality. Though the drugs/me .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X