TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 661X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ented by: Jitendra C. Thakkar, (in person) Per : Ramesh Nair Revenue filed this ROM application pointing out error in the first para of the order No. A/89803/17/SMB dt.1.9.2017 that there a mention "Thirteen (13) years have passed. But no re-adjudication order has been passed". 2. Shri M.K. Mall, Ld. Assistant Commissioner (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that the Hon'ble CEST ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tigation in this case, we find that the case was made out in the year 2001 therefore even more than 13 years have passed facing the litigation by the appellant. Accordingly, we do not find any error in the order of this Tribunal dt. 1.9.2017. Moreover this mention does not prejudice the Revenue or render any hindrance in passing the re-adjudication order. As per our above view, the ROM application ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|