9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 344X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etention of goods - consignment of goods that was being transported was not accompanied by the necessary declaration in Form KER I, which was mandated for supplies effected in the State - Held that: - identical matter has been disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court in The Commercial Tax Officer And The Intelligence Inspector Versus Madhu. M.B. [2017 (9) TMI 1044 - KERALA HIGH COURT], direct ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of goods that was being transported was not accompanied by the necessary declaration in Form KER I, which was mandated for supplies effected in the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he had entrusted the goods to a transporter and the transporter was obliged to file a declaration in Form KER II, and inasmuch the respondents had not enabled the generation of a KER II de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nnection with the detention can be completed within a week from today, and taking note of the judgment dated 30.08.2017 of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1802 of 2017, I direct the 1st respondent to complete the adjudication process in connection with the detention evidenced by Ext.P3 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
