Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (11) TMI 58

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eferred to as "the Act") read with sections 193 and 196 of the Indian Penal Code. The facts in brief are: that the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, filed a complaint under the above noted sections against the petitioner, alleging therein that on February 8, 1991, search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the Act was carried out at the premises of the petitioner and valuables comprising the following items were seized: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) Bullion/Gold ornaments 78,61,000 (b) Cash 42,19,100 (c) Unexplained jewellery 10,00,000 (d) Unexplained investment (details to be submitted later) of Rs. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alling the order of summoning and for discharge, inter alia, pleading that earlier the petitioner took time to submit the details, as he was not sure of the factual position, and that subsequently he realised that the amount of Rs.29 lakhs was surrendered in excess and the amount of Rs.1.3 crores covered the entire amount. Thus, the petitioner sought to revise the surrendered income to Rs.1.3 crores by his letters dated March 9, 1991 and March 25, 1991. The ACMM vide impugned order dated October 27, 1998, rejected the contentions of the petitioner observing that it is a warrant trial case and that witnesses have yet not been examined and, therefore, the application for discharge was not maintainable. I have heard learned counsel for the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al state. It reads: "278E. Presumption as to culpable mental state.-(1) In any prosecution for any offence under this Act which requires a culpable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state but it shall be a defence for the accused to prove the fact that he had no such mental state with respect to the act charged as an offence in that prosecution. Explanation.--In this sub-section, 'culpable mental state' includes intention, motive or knowledge, of a fact, or belief in, or reasons to believe, a fact. (2) For the purposes of this section, a fact is said to be proved only when the court believes it to exist beyond reasonable doubt and not merely when its existence is established by a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates