2018 (6) TMI 759

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... COURT - 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 141 (Mad.)
MADRAS HIGH COURT - HC
Dated:- 16-3-2018
W.A.No.596 of 2018 - -
Customs
MR. S. MANIKUMAR AND MRS. MRS. V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, JJ. For The Appellants : Mr. A. P. Srinivas JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Writ Appeal is against an interim order in M.P.No.2 of 2012 in W.P.No.29173 of 2012, dated 31.10.2012, by whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as, learned counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Chennai, appellant herein submitted that W.P.No.29173 of 2012, itself has been disposed of on 3. It is well settled that an interim order passed, merges with the disposal of the main case. On the principle of law that interim order merges with final orders, we deem it fit to consider few decisions. (i) In South Eastern Coal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... xist. (iii) In State of West Bengal and Others Vs Banibrata Ghosh and Others reported in (2009) 3 SCC 250, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the Interim Order does not decide the fate of the parties to the litigation finally, it is always subject to and merges with the final order passed in the proceedings. 4. In the light of the above decisions, nothing survives in the writ appeal for adjud .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X