Appellant's clandestine removal of goods, failure to register u/r 9 leads to confirmed duty demand and extended limitation.

No export of goods - Clandestine removal - Conditions of the notification not satisfied - The appellant has removed the goods without informing the Department. The appellant has also not registered under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules - Demand of duty confirmed by invoking extended period of limitation. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X