Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (1) TMI 970

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed by the appellant herein as a summary suit seeking for recovery of ₹ 20,53,944/- against the defendants and also for interest @ 18% per annum. The defendants entered appearance and thereafter the plaintiff moved an application for service of summons for judgment upon the defendants. Summons for judgment were duly served upon the defendants and immediately thereafter, they filed an application for leave to defend the present suit. The defendants also moved an application under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure taking up the plea that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit and, Therefore, the plaint should be returned. Since an objection with regard to the territorial jurisdiction of Delhi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eques were presented in the Delhi account of the appellant, the same would not vest any jurisdiction on this Court. Another plea raised by the appellant that the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed at Delhi was dealt with by the learned Single Judge, stating that simply because such a complaint has been filed at Delhi would not confer any jurisdiction on the Civil Courts in Delhi. 3. The aforesaid findings and conclusions arrived at by the learned Single Judge are challenged in this appeal, on which we have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant. We have also been taken through the records. Counsel appearing for the appellant has drawn our pointed attention to the notice which is annexed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tio of the aforesaid decisions could not be applicable, for in our considered opinion, no part of cause of action has arisen in Delhi, which is proved from the evidence on record. The defendant Company is situated at Village Kassar, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, Haryana and is working for gain from the same address. The goods were supplied from Faridabad to Bahadurgarh, which is also the case of the appellant as stated in the reply filed to the application under Order VII Rule 10 CPC. It is, thus, established and proved that the goods were not supplied from Delhi. All the invoices/bills were also issued by the appellant at Faridabad in the name of the defendant No. 1, who works for gain at Bahadurgarh and the goods were delivered at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reference to the drawee bank on which the cheque is drawn and not all banks where the cheque is presented for collection, including the bank of the payee in whose favor the cheque is issued. In the said decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraphs 9 and 10 held as follows: 9. The use of the words a bank and the bank in the Section is indicator of the intention of the Legislature. The former is indirect article and the latter is pre-fixed by direct article. If the Legislature intended to have the same meanings for a bank and the bank , there was no cause or occasion for mentioning it distinctly and differently by using two different articles. It is worth noticing that the word banker in Section 3 of the Act is pre-fixed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he cheque in the drawee or payee bank on which the cheque is drawn within the period of six months from the date on which it is shown to have been issued. In other words a cheque issued by (A) in favor of (B) drawn in a bank named (C) where the drawer has an account can be presented by the payee to the bank upon which it is drawn i.e. (c) bank with a period of six months or present it to any other bank for collection of the cheque amount provided such other bank including the collecting bank presents the cheque for collection to the (C) bank. The non presentation of the cheque to the drawee-bank within the period specified in the Section would absolve the person issuing the cheque of his criminal liability under Section 138 of the Act, who .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates