2018 (8) TMI 1464

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant had deposited ₹ 16,19,750/- during the proceedings and further ₹ 10,00,000/- in February, 2013. These all are evidenced by the Tribunal. Since, the appellant has deposited almost ₹ 26,00,000/- against the confirmation of ₹ 51,79,564/- and contesting the issue on merits, it is considered that the amount deposited by the appellant herein is enough to hear a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 377; 5,000/- to the other side and report compliance on 29.09.2016. We find, from the copies of GAR-7 challans enclosed herewith, the appellant had deposited the amount of cost and informed the Superintendent and not informed to the Tribunal. Hence, the appeal got dismissed. Since, the applicant/appellant has complied with the order of payment of cost within the period as mentioned in misc. order. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant has deposited almost ₹ 26,00,000/- against the confirmation of ₹ 51,79,564/- and contesting the issue on merits, we consider the amount deposited by the appellant herein is enough to hear and dispose of appeal on merits. Application for waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amount involved is allowed and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of appeal. (Order dictated p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X