2018 (8) TMI 1472

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntertain the present writ petition against the order dated 20th December, 2017 under Section 254 (2) of the Act, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all contentions and issues in the appeal against the order dated 25th August, 2017. Scope and ambit of interference against an order under Section 254 (2) of the Act is limited and far narrower than in an appeal under Section 260A of the Act. D .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llate Tribunal should have been recalled and the appeal heard afresh as some of the judgments referred to and relied upon by the petitioner were not noticed. It is submitted that the view expressed in the order dated 25th August, 2017 is contrary to the view expressed in orders of Coordinate Benches. 3. The impugned order dated 20th December, 2017 records that some of the judgments referred to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 7. We are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition against the order dated 20th December, 2017 under Section 254 (2) of the Act, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all contentions and issues in the appeal against the order dated 25th August, 2017. Scope and ambit of interference against an order under Section 254 (2) of the Act is limited and far narrower than in an appeal un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X