Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1954 (11) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessee had further maintained three sets of accounts for the purpose of concealing its income. In a statement made under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, Bhim Sah, a member of the undivided family conceded that three sets of accounts were maintained in order to conceal the income. Bhim Sah further admitted that the Paicha khata in the books originally produced really represented sales that were sought to be concealed . Finally the Income-tax Officer determined the total income of the assessee for the assessment year 1945-46 to be ₹ 70,440. This amount was reduced on appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner by ₹ 10,488. Meanwhile the Income-tax Officer started a proceeding under section 28 (1)(c) of the Act against .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alty on a Hindu undivided family which had ceased to exist. The Income-tax Officer appealed to the Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal and the order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was confirmed. At the instance of the Income-tax Department the Tribunal has stated a case on the following questions of law: (1) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer could impose a penalty on 24th April, 1950, under section 28(1)(c) of the Act in respect of concealment of income by the Hindu undivided family of Sanichar Sah Bhim Sah whose members had become separated with effect from 14th February, 1946 ? and (2) Whether in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 28 authorises the Income-tax authorities to impose penalty on a Hindu undivided family. But the power of the Income-tax authorities to impose the penalty is subject to the peremptory condition that notice must be given to the Hindu undivided family to show cause. In other words, the penalty cannot be imposed by the Income-tax authorities unless the Hindu undivided family is heard or is given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before the final order is passed. It is also important to remember in this connection that a Hindu undivided family is a separate legal unit under the scheme of the Indian Income-tax Act. As I have already stated, section 2(9) defines a person to include a Hindu undivided family. Section 3 treats a Hindu undivid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the proceedings taken under section 28 of the Act for imposing penalty on the Hindu undivided family of Sanichar Sah Bhim Sah whose members had become separated with effect from the 14th of February, 1946. The argument put forward by Mr. Bahadur on behalf of the Income-tax Department was that the machinery prescribed by section 25A could be applied for recovery of the penalty imposed on the Hindu undivided family even after they had become separated. In my opinion the argument is unsound. Section 25A(i) states: Where, at the time of making an assessment under section 23, it is claimed by or on behalf of any member of a Hindu family hitherto assessed as undivided that a partition has taken place among the members of such family, the Inc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which had become disrupted. This is clear from the opening words of section 25A (1)- Where at the time of making an assessment under section 23. This view is also borne out by the language of section 25A (2) which states that the member or group of members shall be liable for a share of the tax on the income assessed. Section 25A (2) does not say that the member or group of members shall be liable to pay a share of the penalty imposed upon a Hindu undivided family. It cannot be argued and it was not argued on behalf of the Income-tax Department that the expression tax in section 25A includes penalty also, for the Legislature has made a sharp distinction between tax and penalty in enacting the various provisions of the Income-tax Act. F .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates