9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 1629X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri Atul Handa, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein demand of duty has been confirmed along with interest and penalty. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in fabrication of body chassis supplied by M/s. Swaraj Mazda Limited (SML for short). During the relevant t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant submits that in their own case, for the earlier period, vide Final Order Nos. 61971-61972/2017, dated 10-10-2017, this Tribunal has confirmed the demand along with interest but dropped the penalties against the appellant. The said order is under challenge before the Hon'ble Apex Court, therefore he prays that penalty on the appellant is to be evaded. On the other hand, Ld. AR supported ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... required to pay duty in terms of Rule 10A of the Rules was in dispute and the same has been settled by this Tribunal in the case of Audi Automobiles (supra) on 21-5-2009. We take a note of the fact that in the case of Audi Automobiles (supra) itself, this Tribunal observed that the appellant cannot be accused of any suppression of documents. In that circumstance, we hold that the extended period i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
