2017 (9) TMI 1749

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s (Preventive), New Delhi, against the Commissioner (Appeals)'s Order No. CC(A)Cus/482/2014, dated 1-8-2014 whereby Mr. Shah Faisal Mukri has been allowed to re-export gold jewellery on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 5.00 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 575000/-. Revision of Commissioner (Appeals)'s order is requested mainly on the ground that the re-export of jewellery has been allowed wrongly by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ly effected on the Delhi railway station which is far away from the airport area. Thus it is clearly a town seizure case and is not a baggage matter at all. There is no clue in the RA by which this case can be related with a baggage. Therefore, Government considers that a revision application in respect of the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order involving the town seizure of the smuggled goods cannot b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X