9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (11) TMI 1130X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd two others [2018 (9) TMI 1261 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] where it has been held that the goods were not covered with the requirement of E-way bill during 1.2.2018 to 31.3.2018. The goods in the present case were seized on 26.3.2018 that is only for the reason they were not accompanied with the E-way bill - Since the requirement of the E-way bill was not applicable for the petitioner during the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018 (M/S Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. vs. State of U.P. and two others) decided on 18.9.2018 and in para 56 it has been held that the goods were not covered with the requirement of E-way bill during 1.2.2018 to 31.3.2018. The goods in the present case were seized on 26.3.2018 that is only for the reason they ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
