9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (11) TMI 1562X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in appeal against the Judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal), dated 4th September, 2015. Following question is presented for our consideration:" Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in deleting the additions made on account of provisions of performance related pay to director and staff amounting to Rs. 1,77,87,000/ignoring t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t dismissed the Revenue's appeal, making following observations: "We have considered the rival submissions of counsel for both the parties on either side and gone through the material and evidence available on records. The case of the revenue is that the addition so made by the AO should not be deleted by the CIT(A). We find from the order of the CIT(A) that the documents which were placed b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llowing the expenses claimed regarding payment of PRP to the Director since records of the assessee show that they are bonafide expenses which was crystallized. Accordingly, we see no reason to interfere in the findings of the CIT(A). Apart from this, the issue of disallowance of provisions has already been decided by the Tribunal in assessee's own case vide its order dated 13-11-2006, wherein ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... educted while making such payments. The Tribunal, therefore, concluded that the liability to make payments had crystallized. The payments could not made only because approval of the Board of Directors, was not forthcoming. 4. We do not find any error in the view of the Tribunal. The principle that when a liability has accrued but the computation thereof with precession, is not possible presently, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
