9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 335X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aabu For the Petitioner : Mr.V.Srikanth For the Respondents : Mrs.R.Hemalatha standing counsel ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the detention notice dated 15.11.2018 issued under Section 142 1(a)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The case of the petitioner is as follows: The petitioner-Company had exported Flexible Intermediate Bulk Container Bags (FIBC) in the capacity of manufacture ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etail. The second respondent rejected the petitioners' objection and confirmed the proposal on the ground that the drawback was claimed in an irregular and fraudulent manner. The second respondent also imposed penalty. A common order was passed by the second respondent, demanding drawback amount from the petitioner and their sister concern and also imposing penalty on them. The petitioner fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ctification of mistake is, admittedly, pending before the first respondent, the impugned detention notice issued in the meantime, causes great hardship to the petitioner and therefore, the same cannot be sustained. 4. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondents admitted to the position that the rectification petition filed by the petitioner is posted for hearing on 31.01.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... raised by the petitioner as against the order of adjudication, which is the subject matter of the rectification petition, this writ petition is disposed of, only by directing the respondents to keep the detention notice in abeyance, till the disposal of the rectification petition by the first respondent. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
