Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (2) TMI 582

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - Held that:- The issue has been clarified by insertion of illustration to Section 65(F) of the Finance Act, 2015, wherein such agency commission became taxable to service tax. The appellant has also paid the amount which is also not disputed by the Revenue. It is on record that during that period there was decision in case of State Bank of Patiala [2016 (10) TMI 800 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] wherein .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Per Bijay Kumar 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by the Order-in-Original No. JAI-EXCUS-000-COM-29-15-16 dated 27/07/2015, wherein Ld. Adjudicating Authority has confirmed the demand of ₹ 14,97,82,395/- including the Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess, along with the penalty and also imposed penalty of equal amount under the provision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on agency commission received by them. Ld Advocate states that Department was fully aware of the fact that the appellant was not paying Service Tax on agency commission received by them. Department vide its letter dated 3/12/2013 and 10/09/2014, has asked to submit the details of such agency commission which was provided by the appellant vide letter dated 17/12/2013 to the Department. Thus, in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue has been clarified by insertion of illustration to Section 65(F) of the Finance Act, 2015, wherein such agency commission became taxable to service tax. The appellant has also paid the amount which is also not disputed by the Revenue. The question is only regarding the imposition of penalty under Section 78(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. It is on record that during that period there was decision .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates