2019 (2) TMI 1479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ary, AC (AR) for Respondent ORDER Per: Dr. D.M. Misra These two appeals are filed against Order-in-Appeal No. NSK-EXCUS-000-APPL-296-17-18 dated 07.03.2018 passed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals), Nashik. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely, Aluminium Extruded profile/Tubes & Pipes/Bar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onsultant for the appellant submits that even though before the original adjudicating authority as well as before the learned Commissioner (Appeals) they have categorically and vehemently argued that common input services were not utilized in the generation of electricity at their windmill, however, invoking Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 demands have been confirmed. He, thus, submits that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or providing exempted services. In the present case, demand notices have been confirmed on the premise that the appellant have utilized common input services in the manufacture of dutiable goods and maintenance and repair of windmill. The contention of the learned Consultant for the appellant that in repair and maintenance of windmill situated away from the factory used for generation of electrici .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X