9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (1) TMI 1545X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... le with him. In the instance case, no such substantiation was done as in fact there existed no undisclosed income. The entire disclosure was on paper and assessee admitted such disclosure to avoid undue harassment and unwanted litigation. It is a well-settled legal proposition that the deeming provisions are limited for the purposes that have been brought on the statute book and have therefore to be applied in the context of provisions wherein they have been brought on the statue book and not otherwise. In the instant case, the deeming provisions contained in section 69 and section 69B could have been applied in the context of bringing to tax such investments to tax in the quantum proceedings, though the fact of the matter is that the AO has not even invoked the said deeming provisions in the quantum proceedings. Therefore, even on this account, the deeming fiction cannot be extended to the penalty proceedings which are separate and distinct from the assessment proceedings and more so, where the provisions of section 271AAB provide for a specific definition of undisclosed income. Where a specific definition of undisclosed income has been provided in Section 271AAB, being a p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ld. AR has submitted that the issue raised in the additional ground is purely a legal issue and it goes to the root of the matter, the same should be admitted in the interest of justice. In support, reliance was placed on the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in case of National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. CIT 229 ITR 383. The ld. DR is heard who has not raised any specific objection against the admission of the additional ground. After hearing both the parties and considering the material available on record, we find that the assessee has challenged basically the issue of show cause notice by the Assessing Officer, the said additional ground being a purely legal ground, the same is being admitted for adjudication on merits. 4. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of building construction and supply of building material, and has reported income from business, capital gains and other sources in his return of income. A search under section 132 was carried out on 31.10.2012 at various premises of Motisons Group including the residential premises of the assessee and the statement of the assessee was recorded u/s 132(4) wherein he has ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... decision of the Coordinate Bench in case of DCIT vs R. Elangovan (ITA No. 1199/CHN/2017 dated 5.4.2018. 6. Heard both the parties. The penalty proceedings are separate from assessment proceedings, which are initiated with the issue of notice u/s. 274 and culminate with passing of the penalty order u/s. 271AAB of the Act. Further, there cannot be any dispute that the assessee should be confronted with the charge against him which is sine qua non for any valid penalty proceedings. It is only when the assessee is made aware of such a charge against him that he can present his contentions. Thus prescribing the charge in the penalty notice and penalty order is must. Absence of a charge in the penalty notice and not finding the assessee guilty of a clear offence in the penalty order vitiates the penalty order. 7. The question that arises for consideration is the nature of charge(s) specified under section 271AAB of the Act. Whether it provides for a singular charge of undisclosed income for the specified previous year found during the course of search initiated under section 132 on or after the 1st day of July, 2012 or it provides for multiples charges as so contended by the ld AR ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... een taken by the Co-ordinate Bench in case of Mahesh Kumar Jain others (ITA No. 630/JP/17 others dated 27.11.2017) wherein it was held as under: 10. The first and foremost question that arises for consideration is the nature of penalty provisions as contained in section 271AAB(1)(a) and 271AAB(1)(c). In other words, whether these provisions provide for levy of penalty on account of separate and independent charges or these provision provide for levy of penalty for the same charge under section 271AAB, however, subject to satisfaction of the prescribed conditions, the quantum of penalty may vary as specified in the respective subclauses of 271AAB of the Act. 11. In this regard, we refer to the provisions of section 271AAB which are reproduced as under: 271AAB. (1) The Assessing Officer may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act, direct that, in a case where search has been initiated under section 132 on or after the 1st day of July, 2012, the assessee shall pay by way of penalty, in addition to tax, if any, payable by him,- (a) a sum computed at the rate of ten per cent of the undisclosed income of the specified previous year, if su ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... olly or partly, by any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing or any entry in the books of account or other documents or transactions found in the course of a search under section 132, which has- (A) not been recorded on or before the date of search in the books of account or other documents maintained in the normal course relating to such previous year; or (B) otherwise not been disclosed to the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner before the date of search; or (ii) any income of the specified previous year represented, either wholly or partly, by any entry in respect of an expense recorded in the books of account or other documents maintained in the normal course relating to the specified previous year which is found to be false and would not have been found to be so had the search not been conducted. 12. On reading of the above provisions, it provides that the Assessing Officer may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act, direct that, in a case where search has been initiated under section 132 on or after the 1st day of July, 2012, the assessee shall pay by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (A) has erred in confirming the levy of penalty u/s 271AAB(1)(a) which provides for a separate and independent charge and comes under different section than the provisions of section 271AAB(1)(c) which has been specifically invoked by the AO. 9. Further, even for sake of argument, if it is assumed that primary charge of undisclosed income has to be read along with ancillary conditions and thus multiples charges have been prescribed in terms of clause (a), clause (b) or clause (c) to sub-section (1) to Section 271AAB and where the Assessing officer has not stated the specified charge at the time of initiation of penalty proceedings, in our considered view, such uncertain charge at the stage of initiation of penalty proceedings can be made good with a clear-cut charge in the penalty order. In any case, existence of a clear-cut charge in penalty order is a must so as to validate any penalty order and so long as there is a clear finding in the penalty order, no infirmity can be said to arise in terms of initiating of such proceedings and subsequent penalty order. In this regard, reference can be made to the Three Member Bench decision in case of HPCL Mittal Energy vs Add. CIT repor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... slash between the two expressions. When the AO is satisfied that it is a clear-cut case of imposition of penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) of the Act on two or more additions/disallowances, one or more falling under the expression 'concealment of particulars of income' and the other under the 'furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income', he must specify it so by using the word 'and' between the two expressions in the notice at the time of initiation of penalty proceedings. If he remains convinced in the penalty proceedings that the penalty was rightly initiated on such counts and imposes penalty accordingly, he must specifically find the assessee guilty of 'concealment of particulars of income' and also 'furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income' in the penalty order. If the charge is not levied in the above manner in all the three clear-cut situations discussed above in the penalty notice and also in the penalty order, the penalty order becomes unsustainable in law. 16. The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory has held that a person who is accused of the conditions mentioned in section 271 should ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ge (concealment of particulars of income/furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income), the penalty cannot be sustained. 20. Another crucial factor to be kept in mind is that the satisfaction of the AO as to a clear-cut charge leveled by him in the penalty notice or the penalty order must concur with the actual default. If the clear-cut charge in the penalty notice or the penalty order is that of 'concealment of particulars of income', but it turns out to be a case of 'furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income' or vice-versa, then also the penalty order cannot legally stand. 21. Apart from the above three situations in which the AO has clear-cut satisfaction, there can be another fourth situation as well. It may be when it is definitely a case of under-reporting of income by the assessee for which an addition/disallowance has been made, but the AO is not sure at the stage of initiation of penalty proceedings of the precise charge as to 'concealment of particulars of income' or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income'. In such circumstances, he may use slash between the two expressions at the time of initiation of penalty proceed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of initiation of penalty proceedings can be made good with a clear-cut charge in the penalty order. In any case, existence of a clear-cut charge in penalty order is a must so as to validate any penalty order. 11. In the instant case, the notice initiating the penalty proceedings talks about initiation of penalty proceedings U/s 271AAB of the Act in respect of undisclosed income of the specified previous year. However, while passing the penalty proceedings, the Assessing officer has given a clear finding as reflected in the penalty order that the assessee is liable for penalty U/s 271AAB(1)(a) which provides for levy of penalty @ 10% of the undisclosed income. As held by the Coordinate Bench (supra), the uncertain charge at the time of initiation of penalty has been made good and substituted with a conclusive default at the time of passing the penalty order and that in such a case, no fault can be found in the penalty order. In such a case, we donot see any infirmity in the initiation of penalty proceedings and consequent penalty order so passed by the Assessing officer and the contentions so raised by the ld AR in this regard cannot be accepted. Further, we find that the deci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the provisions of Section 271AAB which begins with the stipulation that the Assessing officer may direct the assessee and the assessee shall pay the penalty as per clause (a) to (c) so satisfied in sub-section (1) to Section 271AAB. Further, as per sub-section (3) of Section 271AAB, the provisions of section 274 and section 275 as far as may be applied in relation to penalty under this section which means that before levying the penalty, the Assessing officer has to issue a show-cause granting an opportunity to the assessee. Thus, the levy of penalty is not automatic but the Assessing officer has to decide based on facts and circumstances of the case. Similar view has been taken by the various Co-ordinate Benches and useful reference can be drawn to the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in case of ACIT vs Marvel Associates (supra) wherein it was held as under: 5. We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. vehemently argued that the A.O. has levied the penalty under the impression that the levy of penalty in the case of admission of income u/s 132(4) is m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er cent but which shall not exceed ninety per cent of the undisclosed income of the specified previous year, if it is not covered by the provisions of clauses (a) and (b). (2) No penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). Section 158BFA(2): (2) The Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) in the course of any proceedings under this Chapter, may direct that a person shall pay by way of penalty a sum which shall not be less than the amount of tax leviable but which shall not exceed three times the amount of tax so leviable in respect of the undisclosed income determined by the Assessing Officer under clause (c) of section 158BC: Provided that no order imposing penalty shall be made in respect of a person if- (i) such person has furnished a return under clause (a) of section 158BC; (ii) the tax payable on the basis of such return has been paid or, if the assets seized consist of money, the assessee offers the money so seized to be adjusted against the tax payable. (iii) Evidence of tax paid is furnished along with the return ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... other words, while payment of interest is mandatory levy of penalty is discretionary. It is trite position of law that discretion is vested and authority has to be exercised in a reasonable and rational manner depending upon the facts and circumstances of the each case. Plain reading of section 271AAB and 274 of the Act indicates that the imposition of penalty u/s 271AAB of the Act is not mandatory but directory. Accordingly we hold that the penalty u/s 271AAB is not mandatory but to be imposed on merits of the each case. 15. Therefore, we agree with the contentions of the ld AR that the levy of penalty under section 271AAB is not mandatory. In the instant case, it therefore needs to be examined whether there is any basis for levy of penalty or non-levy thereof and the same will depend upon the facts and circumstances of the present case which we shall discuss in subsequent paragraphs. 16. Another contention which was raised by the ld AR is that during the course of search, no undisclosed income was found as defined U/s 271AAB. Further in the case search u/s 132 of the Act was carried out in assessee's premises but no evidence was found during the course of search excep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ttracted on undisclosed income but not on admission made by the assessee U/s 132(4) of the Act. The AO must establish that there is undisclosed income on the basis of some incriminating material. In the instant case, a diary was found which according to the A.O, it was incriminating material evidencing the undisclosed income. In the penalty order the AO observed nothing related to the diary. However, neither the AO nor the Ld.CIT(A) has verified the contents of the diary as the same was maintained as books of accounts. No other material was found during the course of search indicating the undisclosed income. There is no discrepancy which has been found by the Assessing officer and therefore, there cannot be any undisclosed income in respect of sum of ₹ 17,20,000/- as well. There was no money, bullion, jewellery or valuable article or thing or entry in the books of accounts or documents transactions were found during the course of search indicating the assets not recorded in the books of accounts or other documents maintained in the normal course, wholly or partly. The Revenue did not find any undisclosed asset, any other undisclosed income or the inflation of expenditure duri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... levy of penalty, what has to be seen is whether the surrender so made, in terms of statement of the assessee recorded u/s 132(4) during the course of search, falls in the definition of undisclosed income which has been specifically laid down in terms of clause (c) of explanation to section 271AAB which reads as under: (c) undisclosed income means- (i) any income of the specified previous year represented, either wholly or partly, by any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing or any entry in the books of account or other documents or transactions found in the course of a search under section 132, which has- (A) not been recorded on or before the date of search in the books of account or other documents maintained in the normal course relating to such previous year; or (B) otherwise not been disclosed to the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner before the date of search; or (ii) any income of the specified previous year represented, either wholly or partly, by any entry in respect of an expense recorded in the books of account or other documents maintained in the normal course relating t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and 69B wherein such amounts may be deemed as income in absence of satisfactory explanation. In our view, the deeming fiction so envisaged under Section 69 and Section 69B cannot be extended and applied automatically in context of section 271AAB. It is a well-settled legal proposition that the deeming provisions are limited for the purposes that have been brought on the statute book and have therefore to be applied in the context of provisions wherein they have been brought on the statue book and not otherwise. In the instant case, the deeming provisions contained in section 69 and section 69B could have been applied in the context of bringing to tax such investments to tax in the quantum proceedings, though the fact of the matter is that the AO has not even invoked the said deeming provisions in the quantum proceedings. Therefore, even on this account, the deeming fiction cannot be extended to the penalty proceedings which are separate and distinct from the assessment proceedings and more so, where the provisions of section 271AAB provide for a specific definition of undisclosed income. Where a specific definition of undisclosed income has been provided in Section 271AAB, being a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
