2019 (4) TMI 1132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... NI) 1. Mr. Shalin Mehta, Senior Advocate, learned counsel with Mr. Arjun R. Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioners, invited the attention of the Court to the impugned order to submit that the same has been passed by considering the company, being M/s. Khevana Securities and Finstock Limited, as a private limited company and the order under section 179 of the Incometax Act, 1961 has been pas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tioners could file a detailed reply only on 31.12.2018 pointing out that the company in question is a public limited company and not a private limited company and hence, it was not permissible to invoke section 179 of the Act. It was submitted that however the respondent has proceeded to pass the impugned order without considering the contentions raised by the petitioners in their reply to the sho .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Naig whereas, the impugned order has been passed in respect of several other assessment years. It was submitted that except for petitioners No.1 & 2, the rest of the petitioners have not being served with any notice under section 179 of the Act and therefore, the impugned order is in breach of the principles of natural justice as well as contrary to the statutory provisions. 4. Having regard to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X