9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 1417X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the applicant and learned AGA for the State. The present revision has been preferred against the order dated 29.11.2016, whereby, the discharge application has been moved by the applicant in Case No. 483 of 2013, under Sections 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kosikala, District- Mathura, was rejected by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1. It submitted by the learned counsel for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aggrieved by the said order had challenged the summoning order by filing further 482 petition no. 28504 of 2014 which was disposed of by order dated 30.07.2014, further directed the applicant to move a discharge application to be considered by the court below at the appropriate stage in accordance with law and till disposal of the application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... A.G.A. has contended that revisionist has summoned in the present case on 07.02.2014. The discharge application has rightly been replied by the Court below which do not suffer from any proceedings. Having considered the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the courts below rejecting the discharge application. The revisioni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h following the decision in State of Orissa Vs. Debendra Nath Padhi, 2005 (51) ACC 209 (SC), wherein it has been held that the Court cannot enter into realm of appreciation of evidence at the stage of framing of the charge itself. The jurisdiction of the trial court while exercising power under Section 245 Cr.P.C. is to look into the allegations made in the complaint, statement of witnesses and do ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
