2017 (1) TMI 1664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ms. Sangita Chauhan, Mr. C. Kannan. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Gurukrishna Kumar, Mr. S. Hariharan, Ms. Sneha Iyer, Mr. Vikash Singh. ORDER 1. The High Court, on 29th January, 2016 inter alia directed as under : "A serious dispute has been raised viz-a-viz calculation of 75% of the awarded amount whether Rs. 15,52,089/- would constitute 75% of the awarded amount or whether after calculating .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n account of the amount deposited, which was stated to be less than the one contemplated under Section 19 of the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, the objections raised by the petitioner have not been dealt with by the District Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, on merits. 3. We are of the view, that one further opportunity should be afford .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Judge (under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996). 6. The special leave petition and connected applications are disposed of. 7. The orders passed by the executing court hitherto before, shall stand vacated. 8. Needless to mention, that it would be open to the respondent to move an appropriate application, if the respondent is so advised, for premature payment of deposits m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X