2017 (1) TMI 1664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Enterprises Development Act, 2006, the objections raised by the petitioner have not been dealt with by the District Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Conciliation Act, 1996, on merits - one further opportunity should be afforded to the petitioner, to make such deposit within 15 days, from the determination, of the deposit amount (under Section 19, a fore-mentioned) by the District Judge .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondering upon the calculations referred to during the course of arguments, I am of the view that the same shall be subject matter of the objecting court. In essence, both the parties shall be given one-one effective opportunity to submit their calculations viz-a-viz amount constituting 75% of the awarded amount as per award dated 21.6.2010 and thereafter the objecting court shall determine 75% of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... om the determination, of the deposit amount (under Section 19, a fore-mentioned) by the District Judge, in consonance with the order of the High Court dated 29th January, 2016. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. We are of the view, that the petitioner can only insist for a determination on merits, if it complies with Section 19 a fore-mentioned. In case the petitioner does not make the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X