9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (2) TMI 83X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an income-tax reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee and the following questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal for answer by this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that there was mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under section 154 of the Income-tax Act ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pes, Bharatpur unit of the assessee was engaged in manufacturing and production of sanitary ware, which is a prohibited item under the Eleventh Schedule to the Income-tax Act, as item No. 16. He also observed that the assessee was not a small-scale industrial undertaking. Therefore, the provisions of section 32A(2)(b)(ii) of the Act were not attracted. According to the Inspecting Assistant Commiss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re it, since it was clear from the depreciation chart of the unit on record that the value of the machinery and plant installed in the unit was worth more than Rs. 10 lakhs. The Tribunal further observed that item No. 16 in the Eleventh Schedule mentioned "Table ware and sanitary ware". The assessee is a manufacturer of sanitary pipes. As such, no investment allowance could be allowed and reversed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case, the mistake was apparent that the unit was not a small-scale industrial unit and investment in the unit was more than Rs. 10,00,000. Therefore, from this admitted position, it was apparent that it was not a small-scale industrial unit under section 32A(2)(b)(ii) of the Act, because the total valuation of the unit was more than Rs. 10,00,000. Therefore, this mistake was apparent. Hence, it wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
