TMI Blog2015 (1) TMI 1425X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Admittedly, the order dated 30th August, 2013 was an ex parte order. Since certain directions were indicated in that order, which was not known to the petitioner, therefore, the question of its compliance on or before the next date of hearing could not arise. The Tribunal was harsh in dismissing the appeal on a technicality - matter remanded to the Tribunal for deciding the appeal on merit aft ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he order dated 30th August, 2013 and the order dated 30th September, 2013. By the first order the stay application was dismissed for want of non-prosecution and, by the second order, the appeal was dismissed for not complying with the order of the Tribunal dated 30th August, 2013. Admittedly, the order dated 30th August, 2013 was an ex parte order. Since certain directions were indicated ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|