9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 318X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the Prothonotary and Senior Master on 1st March, 2016. This Court granted their application by restoring the appeal subject to the applicants removing the office objections within 4 weeks. However, the applicant failed to act upon the same and the affidavit as originally filed did not indicate how and when the applicants realized that the order of this Court was not complied with, time was taken ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e for the applicant appellant Mr. Chirag Shetty I/b Naresh Thacker for the respondents P.C. 1. This application has been filed for condoning a delay of 887 days in filing this motion seeking to extend the time for removal of office objections granted by this Court in its order dated 23rd June, 2017. 2. Mr. Bangur, learned Counsel appearing in support of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able the applicants to remove the office objections raised by the Registry. The affidavit dated 18th September, 2018 in support of the motion as filed only stated that the objections could not be removed in view of implementation of Goods and Services Act, 2017 (GST). However, as the same did not indicate how and when the non-compliance of the order dated 23rd June, 2017 was noticed, the Revenue t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... condoned in filing this application. 5. We note that in the present facts, the applicant had failed to remove the office objections and as directed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master on 1st March, 2016. This Court granted their application by restoring the appeal subject to the applicants removing the office objections within 4 weeks. However, the applicant failed to act upon the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
