2017 (3) TMI 1770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent : Sh. Yogesh Agarwal, AR ORDER Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against the order-in-original No. JAI-EXCUS/002-COM-065-13-14 dated 17.09.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration (April 2007 to august 2009), the appellant was engaged in the manufacture of Stone .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Revenue. 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of record, it appears that the period of dispute under consideration the appellant has also asked other manufacturer to do the manufacturing activity. During the course of arguments, ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the job worker was the independent entity and duty for the goods manufactured by him will have to be paid by him .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X