9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 1019X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the present case, the Respondent No.2 was declared NPA on 21.07.2011. At that point of time, the State Bank of India filed two O.As in the Debt Recovery Tribunal in 2012 in order to recover a total debt of 50 Crores of rupees. In the meanwhile, by an assignment dated 28.03.2014, the State Bank of India assigned the aforesaid debt to Respondent No.1. The Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings reached j ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rred, the date of the NPA i.e. 21.07.2011 was filled up. The NCLT applied Article 62 of the Limitation Act which reads as follows:- Description of suit Period of limitation Time from which period begins to run To enforce payment of money secured by a mortgage or otherwise charged upon immovable property Twelve years When the money sued for becomes due Applying the aforesaid Article, the NCL ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , the Section 7 application filed in 2017 is clearly out of time. He has also referred to our judgment in B.K. Educational Services Private Limited vs. Parag Gupta and Associates, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 1921 in order to buttress his argument that it is Article 137 of the Limitation Act which will apply to the facts of this case. 5) Mr. Debal Banerjee, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... result of which the application filed under Section 7 would clearly be time-barred. So far as Mr. Banerjee's reliance on para 7 of B.K. Educational Services Private Limited (supra), suffice it to say that the Report of the Insolvency Law Committee itself stated that the intent of the Code could not have been to give a new lease of life to debts which are already time-barred. 7) This being the ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
