2019 (10) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 9
WP(C). No. 24861 OF 2019(G) - -
CST, VAT & Sales Tax
MR A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. For The PETITIONER : ADV. SRI. V. DEVANANDA NARASIMHAM For The RESPONDENT : ADV. SRI. S. B. PREMACHANDRA PRABHU GOVERNMENT PLEADER DR. THUSHARA JAMES JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, was aggrieved by Ext. P2 series of assessment orders and preferr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uctions, that the amounts have since been credited to the Treasury account of the 1st respondent and hence there cannot be any direction to restrain the prohibitory order at this stage. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was in fact exploring the possibility of settling the issue with the Government pursuant to Ext. P7 Amnesty Scheme, and the communication issu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 series of appeals within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. Needless to say, since the entire amount due from the petitioner pursuant to Ext. P2 series of assessment orders has already been recovered, no further coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, pending disposal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X