9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (10) TMI 333X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND HON'BLE MR. P. V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri S. K. Naskar, AC (AR) for the Appellant None for the Respondent ORDER PER P.K. CHOUDHARY : The present Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the Appellant for condoning the delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. 2. In view of the reasons as explained in the Miscellaneous Application, the dela ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd the goods were confiscated under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. He also imposed redemption fine under Section 125 of the Act @30% and personal penalty under Section 112(a) of the Act, 11-12% (approx). 5. The order passed by the original adjudicating authority was challenged before the Commissioner (Appeals) by the importer. The First Appellate Authority, by passing the impugned order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the revenue and on perusal of record, we find that the enhancement of value has been ordered by the First Appellate Authority on the basis of concurrence given by the importer for such enhancement. There is no challenge to the order of confiscation, but Revenue is challenging the quantum of redemption fine and penalty, which stand reduced by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). 8. On perusal of th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
