2019 (10) TMI 488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ocates for the petitioners.   Mr. D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Deep Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents in WP No.79 of 2018. Mr. D.J. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. S. Redkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents in WP No.80 to 84 of 2018. ORAL JUDGMENT : (per M.S. Sonak, J.) Writ Petition Nos.80, 81, 82, 83 and 84 of 2018 were not on b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the order dated 4th August 2017 indicates that the Tribunal has not even considered the issue of sufficient cause shown by the appellant but the Tribunal has basically endorsed the interpretation of the First Appellate Authority in relation to the provisions of Section 28(3) of the said Act. The Tribunal has held that unless, even the disputed amounts are deposited or paid by the petitioners, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X