9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 1951X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2 - SUPREME COURT ] has held that degree or diploma granted by a University, created by law or under the law, is not required to get recognition by other authority. Thus, it is not in dispute that the respondent No.3-University is a University established under the statute and, therefore, in view of the law laid down in the above referred case that a degree, diploma or any qualification awarded by any University, established under the statute, is automatically recognized and needs no recognition by any other authority, there is no hesitation in holding that the respondent No.2-RNC cannot refuse to register the petitioners under the provision of Act of 1964 on the ground that the respondent No.3-University, from which the petitioners hav ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y, Jhunjhunu (hereinafter to be referred as 'the respondent No.3-University') and successfully completed the said courses in the year 2014. After that the petitioners underwent requisite training of six months in the different hospitals and obtained certificates in this regard and approached respondent No.2-Rajasthan Nursing Council, Jaipur (hereinafter to be referred as 'the respondent No.2-RNC') under the Rajasthan Nurses, Midwives, Health Visitors and Auxiliary Nurse-Midwives Registration Act, 1964 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1964') for registration but as per the petitioners, the respondent No.2-RNC refused to provide registration form to them without any reason. The petitioners served a legal noti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of 1956'), the respondent No.3-University is a University established under the Act of 1956. It is further contended that the degrees and diplomas issued by the respondent No.3-University, which is established by a statute, are automatically recognized and there is no need of separate recognition from any institution including INC. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent No.3-University have relied upon the decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in Ms. Neelam Devi Anr. Vs. Haryana Nurses Registration Council Ors. (Civil Writ Petition No.4021/2009) decided on 19.02.2010 reported in 2010 158 PLR 323. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h an institute affiliated to University and the non-necessity of obtaining approval from any other body was affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bharathidasan University and another Versus All India Council for Technical Education and others - AIR 2001 Supreme Court 2861, referring to a University established under the Bharthidasan University Act of 1981, a degree granted by University established, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held, was not required to seek prior approval of the All India Council for the Technical Education (AICTE) to start a department for imparting a course or programme in technical education. ... ... ... As stated earlier, it is not in dispute that the respondent No.3-University is a University establi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
