1955 (4) TMI 53

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urt under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, ran :" Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the penalty under section 28(1) (c) of the Act could be levied on T.P.S. Hariram Sait in respect of the return filed for the assessment year 1943-44." The facts relevant for the disposal of this question lie in a short compass. T. P. Sokkalal Ram Sait and his min .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the validity of the levy of that penalty that is now in question. Section 28(1) (c) of the Indian Income-tax Act runs : "If the Income-tax Officer……………………………………in the course of any proceedings under this Act, is satisfied that any person………………… .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner and eventually by the Tribunal, was that it was Hariram Sait's father, Sokkalal, who was mainly responsible for the suppression of the income. It should be remembered that Sokkalal died on 22nd June, 1942, and the accounting year came to a close on 16th August, 1942. There was no finding either by the taxing authorities or by the Appellate Tribunal that Hariram himself was in cha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X