2020 (3) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Agarwal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Adv., Ms. Anil Katiyar, AOR And Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR ORDER 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 15.09.2009 passed by the High Court of Gauhati at Gauhati in I.T.A. Nos.8/2006, 6/2007, 7/2007 and 8/2007. The assessment years involved in these appeals .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rio vigore even for the assessment years in question. As a result, in the facts of the present case, these appeals succeed on the same terms. 6. As a consequence of the above, since the issue stands concluded in favour of the assessee there would be no need to continue with the reassessment on that score. 7. The appeals and pending applications are disposed of accordingly.
Case laws, Decisio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X