2020 (4) TMI 767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... RAVI MALIMATH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL,   JUDGMENT RAVI MALIMATH J. Aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.8376 of 2016 in quashing the entire proceedings on the ground that it is a duplication of the entire proceedings, the State is in appeal.   2. The plea of the writ petit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ory forms. Upon receipt of the said notice, a reply was furnished by the petitioner. Thereafter, the second respondent concluded the order of re4 assessment by his order dated 30.01.2016 for the period April 2009 to March 2010 affirming the proposals made earlier. Aggrieved by the same, the instant writ petition was filed. The learned Single Judge set aside the entire proceedings on the ground tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to that time period, the proceedings are required to be quashed and not the remaining period also. 5. Hence, the Writ Appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge is partly set aside. The proceedings are set aside only for the period between April to July 2009. The proceedings shall go on so far as the remaining period is concerned. 6. The Appeal is disposed off accordingly.
Cas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X