9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (5) TMI 223X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondent ORDER ASHOK JINDAL: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein despite the direction of this Tribunal refund claim of excess duty was paid for the month of April, 2012 has not been refunded to the appellant. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacturing of Pan Masala Gutka and paying duty under the compounded levy scheme i.e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ellant within a period of four months. Despite the order of this Tribunal, the direction of this Tribunal has not been complied with by the Adjudicating Authority for refund claim filed by the appellant for the period from 16.04.2012 to 30.04.2012 for Machine No. 2 for a refund of Rs. 9,50,000/- of duty which has been excess paid by them. Against the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 31.01 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
