1990 (5) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... four questions of law: " (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the premium for personal accident insurance policy in respect of the managing director could not be considered to be a perquisite within the meaning of section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ign technician who is not an employee ? We may first dispose of questions Nos. 2 and 3 since they are covered by earlier orders of this court. Question No. 2 : In I. T. A. No. 170 of 1986 an identical question was asked to be referred as question No. 3 but it was declined by this court. Following the said order, we also decline to direct the second question to be stated. Question No. 3 : An .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the premium for personal accident insurance policy in respect of the managing director could not be considered to be a perquisite within the meaning of section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in directing the Income .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X