2017 (1) TMI 1729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the assessee. Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following the decision in the case of Multiplan (India) Ltd. [ 1991 (5) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D] and case of late Tukojirao Holkar [ 1996 (3) TMI 92 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for want of pros .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te noting of the hearing, when the appeal was taken up for hearing on 30.01.2017, none appeared on behalf of the assessee or any adjournment request has been filed by the assessee. Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Therefore, having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X