2020 (11) TMI 199

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o., AOR, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Srivastava, Senior Advocate, B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Ms. Mahima Mongia, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. 2. We find no reason to depart from the finding of fact recorded by the authorities which commended to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecified under that category. 4. The argument of the appellant that the entry 8453 refers independently to 'Machinery for making or repairing footwear', cannot be countenanced. For, that expression will have to be understood in the context of the heading dealing with 'Machinery for preparing, tanning or working hides, skins or leather'. 5. The fact that in some other case benefit has be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X