9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 323X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o review its earlier order rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner only on the ground that the petitioner remained in custody for some times more. The Court in seisin over the matter before release of the petitioner shall put such other terms and conditions as deemed just and proper to ensure his return to custody. Notwithstanding such interim release of the petitioner, the Court shall do well to take all effective steps to conclude the trial within six month hence and the complainant shall also take all such steps as desired by the court concerned for conclusion of the same within the time stipulated. Petition disposed off. - BLAPL No. 10089 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 4-11-2020 - Hon ble Shri Justice S. Pujahari ORDER ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as found that there was no movement of the goods pursuant to such invoices issued by the aforesaid companies, of which the petitioner is the Director, along with one Sanjeev Kumar Singh and others. To hoodwink the Revenue Authority that there was no movement of goods pursuant to the invoices, they have also shown the movement of goods in different vehicles with the help of one of the co-accused and some of which are not at all transport vehicles and received payments through Bank from such companies and which was ultimately siphoned back to the source. The same was found during the search and raid conducted, pursuant to which the petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Singh and others were indicted in the aforesaid case and prosecution was launched agai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g in custody for about two years in an offence punishable for imprisonment of five years, the petitioner be released on bail as there is bleak chance of the trial being concluded in near future due to spread of Pandemic Covid-19 which has seriously impacted the trial. 6. On the other hand, Mr. Tushar Kanta Satapathy, learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the opposite party submitted that the petitioner being indicted in a heinous and serious economic offence or revenue defalcation and his prayer for bail having been rejected on merit once by this Court taking into consideration of the same and also the law in this regard, even if the petitioner has remained in custody for some time more, this Court should not release the petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
