2020 (11) TMI 752

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ONER : BY ADVS. SRI.BOBBY JOHN SRI.S.AJAYGHOSH KUMAR FOR THE RESPONDENT : BY ADV. SMT.TUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADER JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is an assessee under the 1 st respondent, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2 nd respondent to dispose of Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b) appeals filed against Exts.P1, P .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 (Ext.P2 rectification order for the year 2013-14), the petitioner has already moved Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b) appeals before the 2 nd respondent, invoking the provisions under Section 55 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Those appeals are accompanied by Exts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) stay applications. According to the petitioner, pending consideration of Ext.P4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iod of two months. 6. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent appellate authority to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P4, P4(a) and P4(b) stay applications within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner. Till such time, any recovery steps pursuant to Exts.P1, P1(a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X