9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 834X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . There is no reasons not to believe the version of the counsel for the petitioner to the extent that the counsel for the appellant could not appear on account of his suffering from high fever and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition pending. The matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal afresh, after affording an opportunity of hearing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated 9.2.2019, wherein the value of each Tax invoices was less than 50,000/-. The goods in question were intercepted on 9.2.2019 and a detention order dated 11.2.2019 was passed merely on the ground that the goods were not accompanied by the relevant E-way bills. The ground of the petitioner was that there was no requirement of E-way bill as the invoice demand was less than 50,000/- and further it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has also been issued on 24.7.2020. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the counsel for the petitioner Sri Vipin Kumar was suffering from high fever from 11.11.2019 to 17.11.2019 and as such he could not file the adjournment application for the next date which was 15.11.2019. It is on that account that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear to argue and press the a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
