1883 (9) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the Court to which the plaint is presented should have jurisdiction over all the causes of action. The joinder, then, of the claim in respect of the partnership transactions with the claim on account of the agency transactions would not give the Court jurisdiction in respect of the agency transactions. The question is, whether the Court had, independently of this joinder, jurisdiction to deter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... action" in Section 17 is to be taken in its limited or restricted sense. The Subordinate Judge rightly held he had not jurisdiction to deal with the claim respecting the agency transactions. 3. It is next objected that he should have returned the plaint for presentation in the proper Court. The plaint asserted two causes of action, one triable in the district--though by the Munsif and not by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X