9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1343X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt Act of 2002 - HELD THAT:- The substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the provisions of the constitution falls for determination. That apart since an analogous challenge in the earlier round of litigation had been examined by a Constitution Bench of this Court, we see no reason why the present writ petitions should also not be referred to a larger Bench for an authoritative pro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dispose of these appeals, partly allowing them, as follows: i) We uphold the decision of the High Court that the creation of the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and vesting in them, the powers and jurisdiction exercised by the High Court in regard to company law matters, are not unconstitutional. ii) We declare that Parts I-B and I-C of the Act as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tition (C) No. 1072 of 2013 as amended. In connected Writ Petition (C) No. 267 of 2012 the Petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing implementation of the directions issued by the Constitution Bench in R. Gandhi's case supra. 2. Having heard Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned senior counsel and Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned A.G. at some length we are of the view that substantial questions of law ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
