Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (12) TMI 1845

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spondent") as a company limited by shares on 12.03.1982 vide Certificate of Incorporation No. 55-013281with the object of carrying on the business, inter alia, of electrical appliances and equipments. Presently, the registered office of the petitioner is stated to be situated at C-39, Flatted Complex, Jhandewalan, New Delhi- 110055. 3. The respondent initiated the proceedings under S.560 of the Companies Act, 1956 to strike the name of the petitioner off the register due to defaults in statutory compliances, namely, non-filing of Annual Returns from 30.09.2001 to 30.09.2014, and Balance Sheets from 31.03.2001 to 30.03.2014. It has been submitted on behalf of the respondent that procedure under S.560 was duly followed, with notices/letter a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... petitioner-company was not carrying on its business was either provided to the petitioner or was available on the records maintained with the respondent. 6. It has been averred on behalf of the respondent that though the notices/letters under S.560(1) and (3) were sent, their copies and dispatch proof are not traceable. On examination of annexures, it appears that the address of the registered office of the petitioner in the records of the respondent is incorrect. However, the petitioner has not placed on record any proof of intimation of the change of the address of its registered office, to the respondent.Therefore,it is entirely possible that the respondent had sent notices under S.560 to the petitioner on the old address of its registe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... documents along with filing fee and additional fee etc., as applicable on the date of actual filing. 10.In Purushottamdass and Anr. (BulakidasMohta Co. P. Ltd.) v. Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, &Ors., (1986) 60 Comp Cas 154 (Bom), the Bombay High Courthas held, inter alia, that; "18. The object of section 560(6) of the Companies Act is to give a chance to the company, its members and creditors to revive the company which has been struck off by the Registrar of Companies, within a period of 20 years, and to give them an opportunity of carrying on the business only after the company judge is satisfied that such restoration is necessary in the interests of justice." This decision has been followed by this Court in Pancham Hotels Pv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iances. Looking to the fact that annual returns and balance sheets were not filed for almost twelve years, the primary responsibility for ensuring that proper returns and other statutory documents are filed, in terms of the statute and the rules, remains that of the management. 12.Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The restoration of the company's name to the Register maintained by the Registrar of Companies will be subject to payment of costs of Rs. 22,000/- to be paid to the common pool fund of the Official Liquidator,and the completion of all formalities, including payment of any late fee or any other charges which are leviable by the respondent for the late deposit of statutory documentswithin 8 weeks; the name of the petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates