TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1589X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed value given by the Custom Authorities or any penalty etc. which they may have to incur in case petition is dismissed. - CWP-28333-2019 (O&M), CWP-28347-2019 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 5-11-2019 - Ajay Tewari And Alka Sarin, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocate and Mr. Keshvam Chaudhary, Advocate For ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ned Senior counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court passed in WP No. 2728 of 2018 titled RR Marketing vs. Union of India decided on 6.4.2018. In that case two consignments of similar import of multi-function devices were ceased by the Custom Authorities and one of the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent therein was that multi-functio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rective of the Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, under the letter dated 06.12.2016, to the petitioner firm's goods. Aggrieved by the judgment passed in RR Marketing's case (supra), the respondent approached the Supreme Court by filing SLP(c) No.17307 of 2019 which is now pending for 21.11.2019. As per the le ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|