TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 504X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /b. PDS Legal, for the Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. J.B. Mishra, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Mahir Chablani a/w. Mr. Abhishek Rastogi i/b.Khaitan & Co., for Respondents No. 5 and 6. P.C.: 1. The petitioner is before the court aggrieved by two communications both dated 18th March, 2021 issued by the Principal Director General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spondents submits that it is not the case that the attachment orders have been passed without any authority. Action has been taken pursuant to section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST). The Petitioner has remedy under Rule 159(5) to object to the orders. He submits that the D.G.G.I. had initiated inquiry to verify the correctness of payments of goods and services taxes by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re revenue's concern of Rs. 78.91 crores by depositing additional amount in attached/frozen bank accounts and the bank accounts to remain attached/frozen to the extent of Rs. 78.91 crores and petitioner may be allowed to operate the bank accounts over and above the amount of Rs. 78.91 crores over the concerns expressed by the petitioner. 5. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Jetly on instructions from t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|