TMI Blog2021 (9) TMI 263X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HANDRAN PETITIONER: BY ADVS. HARISANKAR V. MENON MEERA V. MENON RESPONDENTS: SMT. THUSHARA JAMES-GP JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court impugning Exts.P3 and P3(a) issued by the 1st respondent and for a direction to the said respondent to release the vehicle detained under it. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner - Sri.Harisankar V. Menon, submits that his client has alread ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onceded that the vehicle in question did not have any commodity loaded in it, any action under Section 129 of the Act will become illegal and thus prayed that same be interdicted. 4. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader - Smt.Thushara James, submitted that the proceedings initiated through Ext.P6 is under Section 122(1)(2) of the Act; while the proceedings, which is assailed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rsuant to Ext.P6; but prayed that said Authority be directed to issue the proceedings culminating there from, before initiating any action under Section 129 of the Act. 6. I find that the stage of interference by this Court in any of the matters, which are in controversy, has not yet commenced because, as rightly stated by the learned Senior Government Pleader, Ext.P6 is only a notice under Secti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|