9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (10) TMI 10X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s, 1982. Further, it is found that this appeal has been filed by the appellant against letter dated 16.10.2017 on 14.01.2019 after considerable delay. There is no application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. No appeal lies in Tribunal against the order of Revisionary Authority - the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. - Ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rence to above mentioned subject, I am hereby directed to inform you that your application for condonation of delay dated 18.03.2017 is rejected by the competent authority on the reasons that your company is a multinational company having best manpower, resources, talent and infrastructure. Further there is no valid and specific reasons given for such delay. Yours sincerely, Sd/- (D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fore the Tribunal, which was registered in the Tribunal on 14.01.2019. 3.1 When the matter was called for hearing today, none appeared for the appellant. Since the appellant has been choosing to abstain from hearing before the Tribunal, the appeal is liable to be dismissed under Rule 20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Further, I find that this appeal has been filed by the appellant again ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
